Vans x Supreme SS '13 (Part II)

wolfstrice09 · Post by **wolfstrice09** » Thu May 23, 2013 10:31 pm

1990s Rowleys anyone?

Post by **MF HectoOR** » Thu May 23, 2013 10:50 pm

OMG OG shizzzzz

Post by **akamedaniel** » Fri May 24, 2013 1:01 am

no no no.. SMH

BTW, Lampin is the model name.

SlipOnFiend · Post by **SlipOnFiend** » Fri May 24, 2013 5:38 am

acoustic_rancid · Post by **acoustic_rancid** » Fri May 24, 2013 7:46 am

The Lampin is so sick! First Carrolls now these? Maybe Supreme's not so bad after all

wolfstrice09 · Post by **wolfstrice09** » Fri May 24, 2013 8:50 am

I feel like they could have done a better job with the colors but other than that I'm with you acoustic. Diggin the fact that they are retroing, if you will, Vans. Something you do not see at all.

rescobot · Post by **rescobot** » Fri May 24, 2013 10:08 am

Interesting.

Post by **DJGuamstyles** » Fri May 24, 2013 12:07 pm

Hmmm...90's steez was so out there, but I can dig these. Thanks Supreme for keeping the new kids away!

TreatnHerRight · Post by **TreatnHerRight** » Fri May 24, 2013 1:53 pm

Ugly Model. ^_^

Post by **Crimson Ghost** » Fri May 24, 2013 3:15 pm

This is so cool :O

acoustic_rancid · Post by **acoustic_rancid** » Fri May 24, 2013 8:19 pm

The navy / burgundy pair is way crazy.

I can see why people'd think these were their dad's airwalks, though.

Post by **akamedaniel** » Sat May 25, 2013 12:28 pm

That mono toned black pair could be cool.

id10tech · Post by **id10tech** » Sat May 25, 2013 12:40 pm

Even I don't like these.

Music City · Post by **Music City** » Sat May 25, 2013 1:26 pm

They would be way better in spring/summer canvas colors.

mackiv · Post by **mackiv** » Sat May 25, 2013 8:16 pm

Gonna need to see em on feet b4 i can judge....they look just tooooo low top...shoulda made em mid tops instead

Under The Palms